Comments page
(You may have to reload this page to see new comments
or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source
section may have been edited since some of these comments were
made.)
Original Paragraph:
On the other hand …
Source: http://patrifriedman.com/prose-others/fi/commented/Future_Imperfect.html#On_the_other_hand_
Add a comment
Comments:
[Sun Apr 11 19:06:33 PDT 2004-101] silent_empathy (NOSPAMsilent_empathy@o2.pl.NOSPAM):
On the other hand, most powerful ciphers get broken. New theories emerge and we are nowhere near (and maybe we'll never be) saying: we have ANY mathematical guarantee of security of any "classical" (ie not quantum) PKC/block cipher/whatever. OTOH, quantum crypto seems to have stronger theoretical properties... We'll see in 30 years. Moreover, most crypto software was broken not because of theoretical deficiencies but reckless implementation. Human factor must never ever be ignored.
Add a comment:
We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional.
Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers.
Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This
will be improved later.
Back to original paragraph
View all comments on Future_Imperfect.html for this
day,
week,
month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package