Comments page

(You may have to reload this page to see new comments or modifications to the source paragraph. Also note that the source section may have been edited since some of these comments were made.)
Original Paragraph:

There is no practical way for music companies to prevent one teenager from making copies of a CD or a collection of MP3's for his friends–but consumers of music are willing to pay for the much wider range of choice available from a store. The reason Napster threatened the music industry was that it provided a similar range of choice at a much lower cost. Similarly for software. As long as copyright law can be used to prevent large scale piracy, customers will be willing to pay for the convenience provided by a legal, hence large scale and public, source for their software. In both cases, the ability of owners of intellectual property to make piracy inconvenient enough to keep themselves in business is threatened by the internet, which offers the possibility of large scale public distribution of pirated music and software.

Source: http://patrifriedman.com/prose-others/fi/commented/Future_Imperfect.html#There_is_no_practical_way_for_music_companies_to_p

Add a comment

Comments:


[Mon Sep 4 19:07:01 PDT 2006-246] Unknown:
In fact, Napster provided a _better_ range of choice, which presented an even more formidable threat, because the music industry's distribution network could not offer such a variety.

Add a comment:

We'd love to get your feedback. Name and email address are optional. Email will be listed with the comment, but munged to foil spammers. Comments may be deleted by the sysadmin.
Currently, all HTML tags are forbidden for security reasons. This will be improved later.
Name:
Email:

Comments:


Back to original paragraph
View all comments on Future_Imperfect.html for this day, week, month.
Read about the SOCS commenting package